Separation Logic
The Separation Logic course is a 4th year MEng and MSc course on local reasoning about programs that manipulate the heap at the Department of Computing, Imperial College London. The course is led by Philippa Gardner, with support from Jose Fragoso and Julian Sutherland.
Description of the Course
In the late 1960s, Tony Hoare developed Hoare logic, a formal system with a set of rules for reasoning rigorously about the correctness of imperative programs that alter the variable state. However, Hoare logic is not good at reasoning about imperative programs that alter the heap state, since the reasoning does not scale. In 2001, building on Hoare’s work and early ideas from Burstall, O’Hearn and Reynolds introduced separation logic, in which the reasoning does scale. This course will provide a whirlwind tour of separation logic, its verification tools and cuttingedge research on reasoning about concurrent programs. Separation logic was introduced to reason about shared mutable data structures represented in the heap: in particular, to catch memory overruns and nullpointer dereferencing. It has been used to reason about C, Java and JavaScript programs, and algorithms for sharedmemory concurrency. There are many academic verification tools, such as Smallfoot, Verifast and Abductor, and the industrial tool Infer, developed by a team led by Peter O’Hearn at Facebook. As well as Facebook, Infer is used by Instagram, kiuwan, oculus, Spotify, UBER, WhatsApp, Marks and Spencer, and Sky.
Course Outline
The course comprises two hours a week for seven weeks. It is be accompanied by comprehensive course notes, which bring together a variety of ideas from the most influential research papers.

The first four weeks will provide a basic introduction to separation logic for reasoning about mutable data structures, using linked lists and binary trees as the primary examples. You will learn how to write program specifications and prove properties of programs, both informally using sketch proofs and formally using rigorous proofs.

The next two weeks will describe tools, demonstrating that reasoning about realworld programs using separation logic is feasible. You will learn about Smallfoot, a semiautomatic verification tool based on symbolic execution, and Infer, an automatic tool based on biabduction. This work constitutes a breakthrough, in that it is now possible prove properties about millions of lines of code, thus making the reasoning viable for industry.
As part of the course, Facebook with Imperial ran a lab on Infer. See our Infer lab 2016 page for details

The last week will provide an introduction to concurrent separation logics. With Brookes, O’Hearn won the Godel prize for this work in 2016.
General Information for 2017 autumn term
Time: Tuesdays 4pm6pm, 2nd–9th week
Coursework Published: Monday 6th of November
Submitted: Thursday 16th of November by 16:00
Feedback: Tuesday 21st of November
Exam: TBC 11th week
Recommended Reading: Mike Gordon has some excellent notes on Hoare logic, which briefly touches on separation logic in the last chapter. Two good books on Hoare logic are: Logic in Computer Science: Modelling and Reasoning about Systems, Michael Huth and Mark Ryan, CUP, 2004; and The Formal Semantics of Programming Languages: an Introduction, Glynn Winskel, MIT Press, 1993.
Most of the work on separation logic is in research papers. Excellent introductions to separation logic include: O’Hearn, Reynolds and Yang’s paper on Local Reasoning about Programs that Alter Data Structures, CSL 2001, and John Reynolds’ undergraduate course notes on separation logic and survey paper Separation Logic: A Logic for Shared Mutable Data Structures, LICS 2002, both found on Reynolds’ homepage. Andrew Appel has published a book on Program Logics for Certified Compilers, CUP 2014 (a copy is available in the library).
Papers describing tool techniques include: Symbolic Execution with Separation Logic, Berdine, Calcagno, O’Hearn, APLAS’05; A Local Shape Analysis based on Separation Logic, Distefano, O’Hearn, Yang, TACAS 2006; and Compositional Shape Analysis by Means of Biabduction, Calcagno, Distefano, O’Hearn, Yang, JACM 2011.
The initial paper on concurrent separation logic is Resources, Concurrency and Local Reasoning, O’Hearn, TCS, 2007, and is worth a read. The survey paper Steps in Modular Specifications of Concurrent Modules, da Rocha Pinto, DinsdaleYoung, Gardner, MFPS 2015, describes some modern developments in concurrent separation logics. There are many additional interesting links given on the Piazza site. If you have further suggestions on what reading material might be of interest, please let us know.